Risk factor noise: "normative noise" and governmental silence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33637/2595-847x.2018-8Keywords:
assessment and tolerance for noise, labor rights, worker's healthAbstract
This article approaches in a critical and propositive way the governmental inertia regarding the necessary harmonization of parameters, methodology, procedures and limits of tolerance pertinent to the noise risk factor. Within Brazil's federal government, there is an anomalous bifurcation from a legal-normative, as well as technical-procedural perspective regarding noise levels evaluation and tolerance, since what is valid for the Federal Revenue Service (Receita Federal do Brasil - RFB) and the National Institute of Social Insurance (Instituto Nacional do Seguro Social -INSS) does not apply to the Ministry of Labor (Ministério do Trabalho - MTb). Therefore, the right to a contribution time reduced to 25 years, granted by the INSS, and the corresponding payment by the company to the RFB, totalling 6% of the employee's remuneration, follow the Occupational Hygiene Standard 01 (Norma de Higiene Ocupacional NHO-01) published by Fundacentro (research institution linked to MTb), while the payment of additional remuneration by the company (20% of the minimum wage) to its employees adopts the anachronistic, elusive and misguided Annex I of the Regulatory Standard 15 (NR15), published by MTb. This work contextualizes and explains the fiscal procedure and the recognition of rights attached to noise, through a historical, inclusive normative approach. The definition and meanings of the main evaluation parameters (Criterion Level - CL, Exchange Rate (ER) and Threshold Level - TL) are discussed. Practical examples that show the harmful consequences to the worker as a result of this "normative noise", caused by the reckless validity of Annex I of NR 15, are presented. Finally, this article raises solutions that harmonize the normative interministerial acts, while proposing corrections of INSS norms that disobey superior commandments.
Downloads
References
Almeida, H. Influence of electric punch card machines on the human ear. Archives of Otolaryngology, n. 51, p. 215-222, 1950.
Vieira, K. G. Perda da força sofrida pelo arco do equipamento de proteção individual auricular tipo concha de acordo com o tempo de utilização. 2003. 73p. Monografia (Curso de Especialização em Engenharia de Segurança do Trabalho), Unesp, Bauru/SP, 2003.
Souza, N. S. S. Hipertensão arterial entre trabalhadores de petróleo expostos a ruído. Cad. Saúde Pública, v. 17, n. 6, p.1481-1488, nov/dez. 2001.
Andren, L. et al. Effect of noise on blood pressure and 'stress' hormones. Clinical Science, v. 62, p. 137-141, 1982.
HARLAN, W. R. Impact of the environment on cardiovascular disease: Report of the American Heart Association task force on environment and the cardiovascular system. Circulation, v. 63, p. 243A-246A, 1981.
Santos, U. P.; et al. Ruído: Riscos e Prevenção, 2° ed. São Paulo: Hucitec, 1996.
http://sislex.previdencia.gov.br/paginas/05/mtb/15.htm
ISO-1999/1990: The statement in the occupational exposure limit that the proposed OEL (85 dB(A)) will protect the median of the population against a noise-induced permanent threshold shift (NIPTS) after 40 years of occupational exposure exceeding 2 dB for the average of 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 kHz.
Artigo Técnico publicado pela Revista ABHO, Ano 9, Número 21, em Setembro/2010, além do enorme valor histórico, é revelador da saga brasileira contra a chaga social representada pelos acidentes do trabalho.
Limites de Exposição (TLVs) para Substâncias Químicas e Agentes Físicos e Ãndices Biológicos de Exposição (BELs). Tradução ABHO - Associação Brasileira de Higienistas Ocupacionais. Cincinnati, 1958. ACGIH - (American Conference of Governamental Industrial Hygiene).
Arcuri, A. S. A.; Cardoso, L. M. N. Limite de Tolerância? Revista Brasileira de Saúde
Ocupacional. 1991; p 19: 99-106
ACGIH - (American Conference of Governamental Industrial Hygiene), Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices, 1976, v. 1 : p. 01-718.
Revista ABHO, Ano 9, Número 21. p9
The TLV®s used as reference by Brazilian law, was from ACGIH ®, 1976. ACGIH ® TLV”™s took into account the working day of 40 hours / week. 1978 NR”™s OEL”™s had to be adjusted for 48 hours / week. TLV”™s had to be reduced for Brazil at that time and were 22% lower than ACGIH due to this adjustment in 1978.
http://docplayer.com.br/22762023-Titulo-analisando-os-limites-de-tolerancia-brasileiros-autoras-teresa-cristina-nathan-outeiro-pinto-maria-cristina-esposito-silverio-p.html (2005). Acessado em 30 julho 2017.